Stormy Daniels’ Lawyer: 10 People Have Offered to Pay the $1 Million Penalty for Her Speaking Out!!!


LENT AND I THINK THERE ARE STILL A FEW QUIS REMAINED TO BE ANSWERED BY MICHAEL AVENATTI

THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR BEING HERE >> THANK YOU FOR TO HAVING ME >> SO MICHAEL CHOEN HOMPHEN HAS HAMMERED ALL WEEK LONG I HAVE TO SAY AS AN ATTORNEY, WHO HAS SETTLED MANY CASES FOR AMOUNTS THAT INCLUDE A LOT MORE ZEROS THAN THIS ONE, I FOUND THE PAPERWORK SURROUNDING THE SETTLEMENT TO BE PRETTY SOPHISTICATED >> WELL, MICHAEL, QUITE HONESTLY, I DON'T AGREE

I THINK ON ITS FACE IT IS SOPHISTICATED, BUT THIS WAS NOT HANDLED APPROPRIATELY BASED ON MY EXPERIENCE THIS WAS NOT BUTTONED UP PROPERLY STARTING WITH THE MISSING SIGNATURE OF HIS CLIENT MR TRUMP >> BUT I THINK IT WAS NOT BUTTONED UP BECAUSE PERHAPS OF THE REPRESENTATION YOU DIDN'T PROVIDE IT, YOUR PREDECESSOR DID, BUT THE REPRESENTATION AFFORDED TO YOUR CLIENT >> WELL, NO, IT WASN'T THE REPRESENTATION AFFORDED TO MY CLIENT THAT REQUIRED MR

TRUMP TO SIGN IT I MEAN THAT WAS MR COHEN'S JOB AND MR TRUMP DIDN'T SIGN IT

AND UNDER CALIFORNIA LAW AND THAT IS WHAT THIS WILL BE DECIDED UNDER, UNDER CALIFORNIA LAW, WE ARE HIGHLY CONFIDENT THE CONTRACT WILL BE THROWN OUT AND MORE IMPORTANTLY THERE IS AN EXPRESS PROVISION — I'VE WATCHED A LOT OF LEGAL PUNDITS THAT ARE OPINING ON THIS DOCUMENT AND ITS ENFORCE ABILITY AND UNFORTUNATELY, A LOT OF PEOPLE AREN'T ACTUALLY READING THE DOCUMENT BEFORE THEY APPEAR ON TELEVISION >> I AGREE >> AND THAT IS A REAL PROBLEM YOU HAVE TO ACTUALLY READ THE DOC DOCUMENT

SO LOOK AT MY COPY I'VE READ IT IT IS ALL TABBED >> EXCELLENT >> SO LET'S GO THROUGH IT

LET'S GO TO THE SIGNATURE PAGE TO BEGIN WITH THIS IS AT THE TAIL END AND FOLKS CAN SEE DAVID DENISON'S LINE AKA PRESUMABLY WOULD HAVE BEEN FILLED IN DONALD TRUMP NOT SIGNED AND YOU BELIEVE THAT IT IS BECAUSE HE DID NOT SIGN IT THAT THE WHOLE DOCUMENT SHOULD BE HELD NULL AND VOID, TRUE? >> ABSOLUTELY >> OKAY

SO NOW LET ME TAKE YOU TO THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PARAGRAPH 11 THAT IDENTIFIES THE PARTIES BECAUSE I NOTED SOMETHING AND I'VE CIRCLED IT ON THE SCREEN THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE BY AND BETWEEN ECLLC AND/OR DAVID DENISON DD DOESN'T THE AND/OR MEAN THAT EC WAS CAPABLE IN AND OF ITSELFC A

DOESN'T THE AND/OR MEAN THAT EC WAS CAPABLE IN AND OF ITSELFEC LC AND/OR DAVID DENISON DD DOESN'T THE AND/OR MEAN THAT EC WAS CAPABLE IN AND OF ITSELFLC DOESN'T THE AND/OR MEAN THAT EC WAS CAPABLE IN AND OF ITSELF AT SETTLES THIS ACTION? >> NO, BECAUSE AND/OR IS A TERNLG OF ART IN THE LEGAL PROFESSION AND UNDER CALIFORNIA LAW, IT IS FOUND TO BE A PLURAL USE OF THE TERM IT IS IN THE CONJUNCTION DIFFERENCE FURTHERMORE, IF YOU LOOK AT PARAGRAPH 8

6 OF THE AGREEMENT, IT SPECIFIES IF THE AGREEMENT IS NOT SIGNED BY ALL PARTIES, IT IS INVALID >> THEREFORE I COME BACK TO WHERE I BEGAN WHICH IS SHOULDN'T SHE REFUSE TO HAVE TAKEN THE 130 K UNTIL THERE WAS FULL EXECUTION? >> WELL, I MEAN THAT CERTAINLY WAS AN OPTION THAT IS NOT WHAT HAPPENED AND SO WE LOOK AT WHERE WE STAND NOW AND WHERE WE STAND NOW IS THAT WE'VE GOT AN AGREEMENT THAT WAS NEVER SIGNED BY ALL PARTIES WHICH IS REQUIRED UNDER CALIFORNIA LAW AND EXPRESSRY REQUIRED UNDER PARAGRAPH 866 THE AGREEMENT

WE ARE HIGHLY CONFIDENT THAT THIS AGREEMENT IS GOING TO BE TOSSED OUTAGREEMENT WE ARE HIGHLY CONFIDENT THAT THIS AGREEMENT IS GOING TO BE TOSSED OUT AND IF SO SHE IS PREPARED TO RETURN THE MONEY >> IT SEEMS LIKE THE QUESTION IS OFFER, ACCEPTANCE, CONSIDERATION

I THINK YOU HAVE ALL THREE LET ME SHOW YOU SOMETHING GO TO EXHIBIT NUMBER THREE EACH PAGE OF THIS AGREEMENT NEEDED TO BE INITIALED AND ON THE INITIALS LINE, I'M PUTTING IT UP ON THE SCREEN, INSTEAD OF DAVID DENISON, IT IS EC

WHICH IS THAT OTHER ENTITY THAT WAS CREATED BY MICHAEL COHEN PRESUMABLY TO SETTLE THIS CASE IN OTHER WORDS, ALL THROUGHOUT THE DOCUMENT, EC SIGNED, NOT DAVID DENISON I THINK BY VIRTUE OF THAT LANGUAGE THAT SAID THAT IT COULD BE EITHER OF THEM AND/OR >> I DISAGREE

AND WE'LL HAVE THE COURT DECIDE BUT I WANT TO ADDRESS SOMETHING YOU JUST SAID OFFER, ACCEPTANCE, CONSIDERATION THERE WAS NO ACCEPTANCE BY DD OF THIS AGREEMENT HE NEVER SIGNED IT

FURTHERMORE, WHERE IS THE CONSIDERATION FROM DD? THE AGREEMENT AND AS YOU KNOW THERE HAS TO BE CONSIDERATION FROM DD EVERYBODY TALKS ABOUT THE $130,000 BUT YOU KNOW BASED ON YOUR DETAILED REVIEW OF THE AGREEMENT AND THE TABS THAT YOU HAVE ON THE SIDE OF THE PAGE, YOU KNOW THAT MY CLIENT BARGAINED FOR NOT JUST MONEY, MY CLIENT BARGAINED FOR OTHER CONSIDERATION FROM MR TRUMP IT IS IN THE DOCUMENT THAT HE WAS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE

AND BY NOT SIGNING IT, MY CLIENT DID NOT GET THE BENEFIT OF THE BARGAIN >> LET ME TALK TO YOU ABOUT THE ARBITRATION PROCESS WHICH I KNOW THAT YOU THINK WAS BOGUS I NOTE THAT THE NOTICE 88, THE 23 NOTICE PROVISION REQUIRED E MAILING OR FAX SCSIMILE AND TELEPHONE OF YOUR PREDECESSOR WOULD WAS KEITH DAVIDSON NOTIFIED IN ADVANCE? >> NOT THAT WE'RE AWARE OF

BUT MR COHEN COULD NOT — EC COULD NOT PROCEED WITH THE ARBITRATION IT REQUIRED ONLY DD IF YOU LOOK AT WHO WAS ABLE TO GET A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, MR COHEN NOR EC HAD STANDING OR THE RIGHT TO DO THAT PURSUANT TO THE EXPRESS TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT

ONLY DD ONLY MR TRUMP AND WE BELIEVE THAT THE REASON WHY IS BECAUSE THEY WANTED TO CONTINUE TO KEEP THIS QUIET AND CONTINUE TO BASICALLY HIDE HIS INVOLVEMENT >> OKAY

ANOTHER QUESTION BASED ON THE DOCUMENTS PUT UP EXHIBIT FOUR THIS IS 31 C AND THERE IS A LOT OF LANGUAGE MR

AVENATTI THROUGHOUT THE AGREEMENT ABOUT THIS HERE'S WHAT IT ESSENTIALLY SAYS IT SAYS THAT YOUR CLIENT NEEDS TO RETURN TO DD LET'S JUST SAY PRESIDENT TRUMP ALL EVIDENCE RELATIVE TO WHAT WENT ON HERE AND THAT INCLUDES E-MAIL MESSAGES, TEXT MESSAGES, INSTRAGRAM MESSAGES, FACEBOOK POSTING OR ANY OTHER TYPE OF CREATION QUESTION, DID STORMY DANIELS HAND OVER WHATEVER EVIDENCE SHE'S GOT OF THIS LIAISON? >> I'M NOT GOING TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION BUT HERE'S WHAT I'M GOING TO SAY

MR TRUMP AND MR COHEN AND OTHERS BETTER BE VERY, VERY CAREFUL RELATING TO STATEMENTS PUBLISH AS TO WHETHER THIS ACTUALLY HAPPENED OR NOT THAT IS WHAT I'M GOING TO SAY >> BUT SHE HAD A CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION TO HAND OVER WHATEVER SHE WAS IN POSSESSION OF BEFORE SHE TOOK THE 130 K

>> AND I DIDN'T SAY THAT SHE DIDN'T AND I DIDN'T SAY THAT SHE DID WHAT I'VE SAID IS I WON'T ANSWER THE QUESTION >> OKAY ONE OTHER QUESTION IF I MIGHT

THERE IS ANOTHER PARAGRAPH I DON'T THINK I BLEW IT UP, BUT 511, DISGORGEMENT THIS SAYS THAT IF SHE VIOLATES IT, SHE OWES $1 MILLION FOR EVERY EPISODE THAT SHE GOES OUT AND SPEAKS IN VIOLATION OF THE CONFIDENTIALITY IT OCCURS TO ME THAT MICHAEL CHOE COHEN MAY HAVE MADE A WIDE BUSINESS DECISION EVERYBODY IS LAUGHING ABOUT HIM GIVING HER 130 K IF IT CAME FROM HIM, BUT HE WILL GET A TEN FOLD RETURN ON THAT MONEY IF IN FACT SHE SPEAKS AND VIOLATES THIS AGREEMENT

THAT IS NOT A BAD RETURN >> MICHAEL, YOU KNOW BASED ON YOUR EXPERIENCE THAT TERM EVEN IF EVERYONE AGREED TO IT,UNCONS BEYOND THE PALE THAT THERE IS NOT A COURT THAT WOULD ENFORCE THAT AT THAT LEVEL WITH $130,000 AT THE FRONT END AND A MILLION LIQUIDATED DAMAGE CLAUSE PER INSTANCE NO COURT IN CALIFORNIA IS GOING TO EVER ENFORCE THAT >> IF THAT IS THE CASE, THEN WHY DOESN'T SHE COME ON A PROGRAM LIKE MINE RIGHT NOW AND TELL WHATEVER THE STORY IS THAT SHE IS DYING TO TELL? >> WELL, I MEAN I THINK WE MAY SEE THAT I THINK WE MAY SEE HER PROVIDE A VERY DETAILED EXPLANATION OF WHAT HAPPENED

SHE IS GOING TO DISCUSS WHAT HAPPENED LET MR TRUMP COME FORWARD AND PROVIDE HIS VERSION OF EVENTS AND LET'S THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DECIDE WHO IS SHOOTING STRAIGHT WITH THEM AND WHO IS COVERING THINGS UP >> HAS ANYONE OFFERED, HAS ANYONE, INCLUDING LARRY FLINT, BUT I WANT TO ASK THIS IN UNIVERSAL SENSE, HAS ANYONE OFFERED TO PONY UP THE MILLION DOLLARS TO PROTECT PER AND SAY HERE, I'M GOOD FOR IT, GO TELL YOUR STORY INER AND SAY HERE, I'M GOOD FOR IT, GO TELL YOUR STORY INHER AND SAY HERE, I'M GOOD FOR IT, GO TELL YOUR STORY IN? >> AT LEAST TEN INDIVIDUALS IN THE LAST THREE DAYS ALONE

N? >> AT LEAST TEN INDIVIDUALS IN THE LAST THREE DAYS ALONE? >> AT LEAST TEN INDIVIDUALS IN THE LAST THREE DAYS ALONE >> TEN INDIVIDUALS IN THE LAST THREE DAYS ARE ANY LARRY FLINT? >> NOT THAT I KNOW OF >> IS SHE CONTEMPLATING TAKING ANY OF THOSE TEN OFFERS? >> NO

>> DOES SHE THINK IN RETROSPECT THAT 130 K WAS CHUMP CHANGE? BECAUSE AFTER ALL, HE WAS ELECTED PRESIDENT I'M REALLY ASKING WHETHER THAT AMOUNT WAS DETERMINED BY HER PERHAPS BELIEVING THE POLLS A WEEK OUT FROM THE ELECTION, HEY, HE'S NOT GOING TO WIN ANYWAY, I MAY AS WELL TAKE THE MONEY >> NO, I THINK WHEN AND IF SHE IS ABLE TO TELL HER STORY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WILL LEARN HOW THAT AMOUNT WAS ARRIVED AT AMONG THE PARTIES BUT THIS ISN'T ABOUT HER HAVING BUYER'S REMORSE IT REALLY ISN'T

>> FINAL QUESTION I'M INTRIGUED PEGGY PETERSON, HOW DO YOU COME UP WITH PEGGY PETERSON, HOW DO YOU COME UP WITH DAVID DENISON? >> WELL, YOU'LL HAVE TO ASK MR COHEN BECAUSE HE IS THE ONE THAT CAME UP WITH THESE ALIASES WE HAVE NO IDEA

>> ALL RIGHT I HOPE YOU GET THE CHANCE THANK YOU APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE >> SO DO I

I HOPE YYOU GET THAT CHANCE TODAY >> HE CAN CALL ME RIGHT NOW I'D LOVE TO HEAR EXACTLY WHAT HIS REACTION MIGHT BE >> I'D LOVE TO HEAR

Source: Youtube


Like it? Share with your friends!

AJ

Choose A Format
Personality quiz
Series of questions that intends to reveal something about the personality
Trivia quiz
Series of questions with right and wrong answers that intends to check knowledge
Poll
Voting to make decisions or determine opinions
Story
Formatted Text with Embeds and Visuals
List
The Classic Internet Listicles
Countdown
The Classic Internet Countdowns
Open List
Submit your own item and vote up for the best submission
Ranked List
Upvote or downvote to decide the best list item
Meme
Upload your own images to make custom memes
Video
Youtube, Vimeo or Vine Embeds
Audio
Soundcloud or Mixcloud Embeds
Image
Photo or GIF
Gif
GIF format